Black Love and a Wise Man: on shelves and screens this month

Love transcends time in Compensation (1999).
Love transcends time in Compensation (1999).

In our latest edition of Shelf Life, we celebrate three long-buried films from Black directors finally seeing the light of day in gorgeous restorations, a Frederick Wiseman smorgasbord crossing the globe, and an expanded doc that’ll make you rock.

I debated whether it was appropriate to mention in Shelf Life that I did my first audio commentary for a Blu-ray release a few months back. Is it gauche to promote yourself in your own column? I’m still not sure. But these things are done far enough in advance that I was able to put the thought aside for a while—until Cinématographe announced its release of Martha Coolidge’s The Joy of Sex the weekend before I wrote this.

In the end, I am resisting my Midwestern conditioning and plugging the disc, because I think it’s cool that it—along with Female Perversions, also new from Cinématographe—features an all-women lineup of contributors on the special features. I especially want to shout out my co-commentator Elizabeth Purchell, a physical-media pro who made the whole process way less intimidating for me. I hope you enjoy the results.

That’s not the only news on the repertory front this month, of course. A major theme in this edition’s Shelf Life picks—and a lovely one for Black History Month here in the US—is Black love, which takes multiple forms as it transcends boundaries of age, ability and time itself. We’ve also got some fresh titles from the documentary scene. But the one thing that all of the films below have in common is that they’re screening in repertory cinemas in February 2025. Show some love to your local art theater this Valentine’s Day. They deserve it.


The Annihilation of Fish

4K restoration opens at BAM Cinematheque February 14 from Kino Lorber and Milestone Films.

Entering the season of romance, an unexpected contender for the most romantic film of the year has emerged: The Annihilation of Fish, a tender, eccentric love story from Charles Burnett. An icon of American independent cinema and member of the L.A. Rebellion, Burnett is best known for his impressionistic slice of Black LA life, Killer of Sheep—partially because it’s great, and partially because it was the easiest of his films to see until recently. The Annihilation of Fish, meanwhile, was never officially released—no theatrical, VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, television, streaming, nothing. So the theatrical debut of UCLA’s 4K restoration is a major event as well as an affectionate recommendation.

Letterboxd saw the liberated Annihilation of Fish on the festival circuit last fall (or on YouTube, where it squatted for a while). And the reviews are glowing, with more than 60 percent of rating it four stars or higher. The storytelling is straightforward, and the tone downright zany at times; the cause of death for this movie was a bad Variety review, and I can see how you could misunderstand it based on those qualities. But that critic doesn’t seem to have watched it until the end. Because as we go deeper into the lives of mentally ill boarders/late-in-life lovers Fish (James Earl Jones) and Poinsettia (Vanessa Redgrave), those attributes actually open a door to truly empathizing with these marginalized characters and their world.

KYK echoes this sentiment in a Letterboxd review, writing that it “doesn’t take long to accept the characters’ fabricated realities, because they so fully accept each other.” Burnett accepts them too, creating what Logan calls “one of the most empathetic and kind works I’ve seen in my life. Many films would laugh at these characters, make a mockery of their grief and their illness. Instead, Burnett chooses to completely treat their situations with grandiosity and love.” It’s high-key romantic as well, and you can search for theatrical dates near you on the Kino Lorber website.

Compensation

4K restoration in theaters February 21 through Janus Films.

Compensation is built around a poem—specifically, a work of the same name by Paul Laurence Dunbar, whose modest eight-line composition appears on-screen at the beginning of Zeinabu irene Davis’s exceptional 1998 film. The movie does rhyme, reaching back and forth across decades of Black life to tell parallel love stories about two couples—one deaf, and one hearing—who are brought together by learning, and torn apart by illness. A spoiler? Maybe, but there’s more going on here than just that.

Compensation immerses us in two disparate, yet interconnected eras: The “Black Metropolis” of early twentieth-century Chicago, and that same community at the end of the ’90s, scarred but resilient amid the AIDS crisis. Each setting has its political and historical nuances: In 1999, Malaika (Michelle A. Banks) is ionate about both her Black and Deaf identities—“this is my world,” she signs furiously to Nico (John Earl Jelks) when he first begins to learn American Sign Language. Malindy (Banks), her counterpart in 1910, is aligned with W.E.B. DuBois and the “talented tenth,” and teaches Arthur (Jelks) how to read written English along with g in ASL. Motherblanca writes that it “flows in and out of time… There’s so much here to absorb: the Great Migration, disability, illness, and how love can be a sweet balm to the hardships we all face in life and it can also simply not be enough.”

Davis casts the same actors as both couples, and the echo gives Compensation a timeless quality that’s also reflected in the storytelling. Much of Compensation is shot in the style of a silent film, a choice that resonates with the film’s deaf theme as well as its historical one: “Davis opts to subtitle almost all of the dialogue, including the ASL sequences, a move that makes the viewing experience accessible” to both communities, as Dr. Ethan Lyon writes on Letterboxd. He adds, “Special attention must be given to the film’s thoughtful depiction of disabled romance, especially between an abled and a disabled person.”

Naked Acts

New 4K restoration in theaters and on Blu-ray from Milestone Films and Kino Lorber.

Naked Acts

Naked Acts 1996

A disciple of Losing Ground director Kathleen Collins (covered all the way back in October 2022, the early days of this column), Bridgett M. Davis came up amid the Black filmmaking renaissance of the ’90s, culminating with her first—and, to date, only—feature film, Naked Acts. The film’s arc is depressingly common for an independent film made by a Black woman: Although it was praised by critics, Davis was forced to self-distribute Naked Acts after distributors failed to pick up the film. That means that it went largely unseen until now, when Milestone Films and Kino Lorber—the same company bringing The Annihilation of Fish to theaters—picked it up for distribution thanks to the advocacy of Black Film Archive creator Maya Cade.

Naked Acts is also a love story of sorts, and an unusual one. The twist here is that it’s about a woman falling in love with herself and her body after a lifetime of repression, spurred by her complicated relationship with her mother. Aspiring actress Cicely (Jake-Ann Jones) is the daughter of Blaxploitation star Lydia Love (Patricia DeArcy), a Pam Grier type whose considerable sex appeal is on display in all of her movies. Her grandmother, meanwhile, was a respectable stage actress best known for her run in Porgy and Bess. Lydia now runs a video store—shades of The Watermelon Woman and its deconstruction of Black female archetypes.

Cicely’s family dynamic similarly lends itself to examining Black women’s limited roles in popular culture, and how they have (and haven’t) evolved over the years. Cicely’s reluctance to perform nude in the “tasteful” art film being directed by her on-again, off-again lover reflects her discomfort both with this exploitation and her own body, prompting the “conversations about art, exploitation, and what it means to put Black women’s bodies on film” Asiyah cites. I was also struck by the film’s vulnerability around weight and weight loss: Cicely’s career is built on her losing a significant amount of weight, and while everyone around her unilaterally praises the “new her,” she still carries the shame of the old one. It all ties back to a quote from the movie referenced in a popular Letterboxd review: “Emotional work can leave you more exposed than taking your clothes off ever could.”

The films of Frederick Wiseman

4K restorations in theaters worldwide.

High School

High School 1968

Welfare

Welfare 1975

Law and Order

Law and Order 1969

Last September, I opened this column by celebrating the big, big news that the collected works of documentarian Frederick Wiseman, long unavailable except through the filmmaker’s own Zipporah Films, were being digitized for the first time. Up to that point, Wiseman was the most influential documentarian known mostly by reputation—I saw a 16mm print of his game-changing 1967 doc Titicut Follies when I was in college, and attended (scant) screenings of films like the sprawling Menus-Plaisirs, les Troisgros when they played in theaters. But I’m still discovering a lot of Wiseman’s work, and I don’t think I’m alone in that.

That by itself makes it worth highlighting that, in the wake of these new restorations, Wiseman retrospectives have started popping up all over. The American Cinematheque in Los Angeles kicked things off last fall, and the Gene Siskel Film Center in Chicago wrapped its series in early February. A series in Paris at the Centre Pompidou continues into March 2025, however, and Film at Lincoln Center in New York just launched a massive retrospective featuring 40 films from Wiseman’s catalog, 33 of them in new 4K restorations. That’s a lot of movie, especially considering that some of Wiseman’s later works stretch out over three or four hours.

For this column, I caught up with two Wiseman documentaries, chosen to represent opposite ends of the socioeconomic spectrum. Welfare (1975, pictured above) is an infuriating look at the Kafkaesque circular logic of the American welfare system made even more depressing by the fact that, as Jude writes, “the bureaucracy of social programs remains as deliberately intransigent, byzantine, and punitive as ever, but what they did give has dried up.”

The Store (1983), meanwhile, exposes the labyrinthine workings of capitalism, through its portrait of upscale department store Neiman Marcus. “Wiseman’s critical eye needed no special angle to expose this towering temple of consumerism,” Maldone says. And indeed, what struck me about both films was their interest in systems, how they work and don’t work, the humans involved, and the dehumanizing effects of being caught up within them—all with Wiseman’s signature imive eye and sharp editing.

Dig! XX

In theaters February through Oscilloscope Laboratories.

Dig!

Dig! 2004

Also stretching its legs in theaters this month is the twentieth-anniversary edition of Ondi Timoner’s legendary rock doc Dig!, dubbed Dig! XX for its expanded run time. Part update and part director’s cut, it adds 40 minutes of new footage to a film that Katie Walsh calls “the ne plus ultra of rock docs.” It specifically captures the choking final breaths of ’90s corporate alternative, as told through the story of two bands: self-proclaimed “world’s most well-adjusted band”. The Dandy Warhols, and the extremely poorly adjusted Brian Jonestown Massacre.

It’s really remarkable that the of the BJM are (mostly) still alive, given the number of cigarettes that are smoked, speed that is snorted, and liquor that is consumed on-screen in this film. Winner of the Grand Jury Prize at the 2004 Sundance Film Festival, Timoner’s picture was embraced, then criticized for the way Timoner inserted herself into the narrative. She lived with these bands for years, riding in the van and crashing on the floors of single hotel rooms with eight people crammed inside. The self-aware pop-star attitude of the Dandys, combined with Newcombe’s sometimes delusional megalomania, make it so that “[it’s] hard not to feel like we’re still somewhat being sold a bill of goods, but the sheen of authenticity for the most part wins out,” as Lexi writes

Dig! XX adds a second narrator, BJM tambourine player and self-proclaimed “sidekick” Joel Gion, to correct a critique of the original: That allowing Dandy Warhols singer Courtney Taylor to tell the story of Newcombe’s one-sided beef with the Dandys showed bias. It’s a lot of narration, and while it might have been necessary to pacify the many clashing egos at work here, it’s unnecessary for the broader narrative. Each version of Dig! captures the yin and yang of artistic creation and self-destruction, both of which live inside all creative people to some extent. We don’t all get high and commune with the spirit of Charles Manson, however. Is that a good thing, or a bad one? Watch the doc and decide for yourself.


‘Shelf Life’ is a monthly column and newsletter by Katie Rife, highlighting restorations, repertory showings and re-releases in theaters and on disc.

Further Reading

Tags

Share This Article