The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

2013

★★★★ Liked

Peter Jackson and the famous carrot are back. So is the slapstick though; fat jokes featuring Bombur and lethargic, overlong set pieces. Along with all new flaws and shortcomings that no Tolkien devotee should have to suffer. Out of the frying pan, but into the fire of poor timing, video game vibes and a seriously pissed off dragon.

Do not confuse devotee with purist, however. The Hobbit may be my all-time favorite book (and the only one I’ve read twice actually), but I don’t get hung up on petty changes, or even more significant ones as long as it’s handled in good taste. Case in point: Tauriel, a new female elf character played by Lost’s Evangeline Lilly. Great casting choice and quite an interesting, well-rounded addition to the ensemble. Marred though, unfortunately, by a much-too-forced love triangle that adds little of worth.

There are improvements, but they’re not many. The action is better and more consistent and it’s nice to have Legolas kicking ass and taking names again. What’s the deal with the new lenses though? Is there a point to that I have missed somewhere? Oh well. It was fun to finally see Mikael Persbrandt as Beorn (a big moment for us Swedes), even if his intimidating, bearded presence is just around for a couple of minutes. I suppose they’re saving him for the last leg of the journey... quest… thing.

The great highlight for me was Smaug. I didn’t care for the way he looked in the trailers, but the cinematic representation was a different beast altogether. Awe-inspiring, brilliantly realized and majestically voiced by the-man-you-can’t-believe-isn’t-a-fancy-egg-dish. O Cumberbatch, the stupendous!

A darker, less fluffy second chapter which comes closer in tone to the Lord of the Rings films, but too often feels like a repetition or remake thereof. “Darkness is upon us” this. “We shall have our vengeance” that. If the original trilogy was a person, the Hobbit flicks are like a younger, less talented sibling that desperately wants to be as impactful and ired. There’s as much potential here as there are golden coins in Smaug’s lair, yet two films into the trilogy it hasn’t found a soul to match the beauty and depth of its predecessors. “The Desolation of Feels” would be a harsh, yet reasonably accurate title.

Two straight letdowns aside, I still felt positive about the sum of the experience. The sets and scenery look more breathtaking than ever. I saw it in 48 FPS, but didn’t get the bothersome “fast-forward” sensation like I did when I saw “An Unexpected Journey”. The clarity in the picture was even more astonishing this time, with an exception for the blurry haze that appeared whenever a lot was moving on screen.

A score of 4/5 is what the previous chapter received as well. On both s for the tremendous entertainment value; not so much the story, which I suppose was doomed from the beginning to fall short of the magic that wrapped itself around The Lord of the Rings films like the finest of silk.

The ultimate sign of my immediate relationship to this movie came when I exited the theatre and felt no desire to watch it again. Which is a little sad as I had planned to, but now altered those plans to a second viewing of “Catching Fire” instead.

I wanted to love this film, this trilogy. I wanted to cherish it for decades to come and it down to future grandchildren like a precious family heirloom. Now, I sense my edge-worn book will be all that they'll inherit.

Block or Report

Mikael liked these reviews

All